THE MAKER MYTH

All Rights Reserved Β©

Summary

Was it a lightning storm that started it? Truly?

Genre:
Scifi
Author:
ahmedakhan
Status:
Complete
Chapters:
1
Rating:
n/a
Age Rating:
13+

THE MAKER MYTH

It was with great anticipationthat people packed the convention hall. Such was the popularity of the guest speaker of the day. There was an air of high expectation all around. The great Mr Arten was coming here, and he was going to deliver a talk on the origin of life. It was bound to be interesting as he had been working on this subject fruitfully for several years.

The buzz in the hall suddenly died. The great person had arrived. The audience rose to give him a standing ovation. He bowed and took his seat with great dignity.

First, there were a few speeches by the organizers about the guest speaker, his life and work, his extraordinary contribution to science, in particular his discoveries about the ever-interesting, ever-mystifying subject of the origin of life. The audience fidgeted and murmured, waiting for all these speeches to end and for the great scientist and philosopher to take up the microphone.

Finally, the moment arrived. With ponderous steps, Mr Arten mounted the podium. He cast a grave glance at the packed hall. A hush fell over the audience.

And then he began speaking. His voice was sonorous, his delivery clear. He exuded an aura of supreme self-confidence.

He spoke thus:

Ladies and gentlemen, I am here to prove the creationists wrong.

Let us go about it logically.

What are the arguments that the creationists put forward? The primary one concerns the chain of cause and effect - the argument that the existence of a thing points to the existence of its maker.

Why should this reasoning be true? I agree that we have yet to discover any causeless effect, but does it mean that it does not exist, never did exist and will never exist in the future? As you can see, this line of argument leads us into a labyrinth of philosophical concepts, without helping us reach any conclusive result. All we can concede is that creationist view is nothing more than a mere hypothesis.

I want to presentthe counter hypothesis that causality does break down at some level of existence, and at that point, a thing can come into existence spontaneously. There doesn't always have to be a maker.

The second argument that the creationists put forward is this: strange objects, pictures and signs have been unearthed which point to the existence, at some time in the very remote past, of the Maker. They believe that at one time, much before our existence, the Maker lived on earth. He created us in order to serve him. But later, something befell the Maker and he vanished from the earth, leaving only vague traces.

Now, this is an interesting argument. I see that my esteemed opponent Mr Defore is in the audience. I am sure he can provide you with more details about these so called signs of the Maker. However, it was to these very signs that I have applied myself for the past decade. My research has been gathered in a book called "The Maker Myth", which is now undergoing publication. I urge you all to read this book when it comes out. I promise that you will find it interesting and stimulating. In this book, I have taken the alleged signs of the Maker and have postulated possible rational causes for each and every one of them, proving that these signs do not necessarily point to the Maker.

So then, if there is no Maker, how did we come into existence? This is the question that I am going to answer now. Listen carefully to the following scenario and see how rational, how intellectually satisfying it is.

In the beginning there was a timeless singularity. This singularity exploded in a big bang and gave birth to two things, matter and energy. The existence of matter and energy resulted in the simultaneous existence of time. The world progressed. Chaos settled into order. The matter, influenced by energy, formed various ordered elements, substances, planets, suns, and so on. One of the planets thus formed was earth.

On earth, several random combinations of elements took place and several substances were formed. One of these substances was also the substance of our bodies. This substance, when formed, had no coherent shape. Then, with the passing of eons and the continuation of random combinations, once again order resulted from chaos and some of the substances arranged themselves into an orderly shape - the shape of our bodies. The substance was of course, lifeless. It probably lay lifeless for several more eons until, on pure chance, a bolt of lightning hit it. Electricity coursed through it, and this electricity did strange things to it. It gave sentience and motion to the substance.

That was the first being, the father of us all. Once he became alive, he took control of what so far had been a random process. He began gathering and giving shape to the substances. He discovered how to create electricity and he also discovered other sources of power. With these power sources, he gave life to the images he had assembled. In short, he created more beings like himself, who then helped him to create still more, till the world was populated by our like.

That is my hypothesis about our origin. Tell me honestly. Isn't it a beauty? And where does the so-called Maker come into it?

In conclusion, ladies and gentlemen, I firmly believe that us robots came into being by ourselves as I have described, and the myth of Man, the Maker, is just that - a myth.


Continue Reading
Further Recommendations

Ayira Damdindorj: Love these series. Fantacy romance has become my new fav.

mpaulinemofokeng84: Loved it and would love to finish the whole book

Adebimpe Otufodunrin Udeagha: Nice story.

amy: Here, quiet, since *these shouldn't be wrong. Really enjoyed the last chapter. No one truly abolishes gov unless one chooses to live outside of it. More world development would be nice, but would also add I'm sure a TON of words, and for reading this on my phone and it read in less than 24 hrs, m...

Vee: Really good story enjoyed it πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜‰

Mansi: Excited to find out whats next

Gracie Arzola: I really liked it just sad it ended

Nur Shaqilla: Amazing storyline. A must read. 100% guarantee you'll enjoy this no doubt.

Christly: I would say that the book is an awesome read. A grim gaze into the future. A protagonist just as interesting as the story it self.

More Recommendations

Angela Hearne: Great story just not sure about the hotel... not too smart.

Kirsten Merkes: I am obsessed with this story! I can't help feeling a bit sad knowing it's almost over. There is only one small part of the story that is a bit confusing, at times the character Camille seems to refer to her sister Naomi as "Mother". Not sure if maybe I'm misreading the paragraphs. Otherwise...ou...

Alice Moonsing: I absolute loved end enjoy this novell!I look forward for more novells.πŸ‘β€

Kirara: Overall good book with likable characters and an easy to follow plot. Amazing for your first finished book, one of my favorite reads this pandemic crisis. There are only small spelling error and spacing between paragraphs would make it more aesthetically pleasing, but that’s my personal opinion. ...

Cosey Josey: I wasn't sure what to expect: "another wolf story", but it was such a surprise!Very refreshing actually :D I don't know how you came up with it, but it's one of the coolest concepts I've read about in a while now!Your writing is really good, very pleasant to read. Also, the characters are describ...

peppertree: Great read. Loved the first book so much, glad there's more:

About Us

Inkitt is the world’s first reader-powered publisher, providing a platform to discover hidden talents and turn them into globally successful authors. Write captivating stories, read enchanting novels, and we’ll publish the books our readers love most on our sister app, GALATEA and other formats.