THE MAKER MYTH

All Rights Reserved ©

Summary

Was it a lightning storm that started it? Truly?

Genre:
Scifi
Author:
ahmedakhan
Status:
Complete
Chapters:
1
Rating:
n/a
Age Rating:
13+

THE MAKER MYTH

It was with great anticipationthat people packed the convention hall. Such was the popularity of the guest speaker of the day. There was an air of high expectation all around. The great Mr Arten was coming here, and he was going to deliver a talk on the origin of life. It was bound to be interesting as he had been working on this subject fruitfully for several years.

The buzz in the hall suddenly died. The great person had arrived. The audience rose to give him a standing ovation. He bowed and took his seat with great dignity.

First, there were a few speeches by the organizers about the guest speaker, his life and work, his extraordinary contribution to science, in particular his discoveries about the ever-interesting, ever-mystifying subject of the origin of life. The audience fidgeted and murmured, waiting for all these speeches to end and for the great scientist and philosopher to take up the microphone.

Finally, the moment arrived. With ponderous steps, Mr Arten mounted the podium. He cast a grave glance at the packed hall. A hush fell over the audience.

And then he began speaking. His voice was sonorous, his delivery clear. He exuded an aura of supreme self-confidence.

He spoke thus:

Ladies and gentlemen, I am here to prove the creationists wrong.

Let us go about it logically.

What are the arguments that the creationists put forward? The primary one concerns the chain of cause and effect - the argument that the existence of a thing points to the existence of its maker.

Why should this reasoning be true? I agree that we have yet to discover any causeless effect, but does it mean that it does not exist, never did exist and will never exist in the future? As you can see, this line of argument leads us into a labyrinth of philosophical concepts, without helping us reach any conclusive result. All we can concede is that creationist view is nothing more than a mere hypothesis.

I want to presentthe counter hypothesis that causality does break down at some level of existence, and at that point, a thing can come into existence spontaneously. There doesn't always have to be a maker.

The second argument that the creationists put forward is this: strange objects, pictures and signs have been unearthed which point to the existence, at some time in the very remote past, of the Maker. They believe that at one time, much before our existence, the Maker lived on earth. He created us in order to serve him. But later, something befell the Maker and he vanished from the earth, leaving only vague traces.

Now, this is an interesting argument. I see that my esteemed opponent Mr Defore is in the audience. I am sure he can provide you with more details about these so called signs of the Maker. However, it was to these very signs that I have applied myself for the past decade. My research has been gathered in a book called "The Maker Myth", which is now undergoing publication. I urge you all to read this book when it comes out. I promise that you will find it interesting and stimulating. In this book, I have taken the alleged signs of the Maker and have postulated possible rational causes for each and every one of them, proving that these signs do not necessarily point to the Maker.

So then, if there is no Maker, how did we come into existence? This is the question that I am going to answer now. Listen carefully to the following scenario and see how rational, how intellectually satisfying it is.

In the beginning there was a timeless singularity. This singularity exploded in a big bang and gave birth to two things, matter and energy. The existence of matter and energy resulted in the simultaneous existence of time. The world progressed. Chaos settled into order. The matter, influenced by energy, formed various ordered elements, substances, planets, suns, and so on. One of the planets thus formed was earth.

On earth, several random combinations of elements took place and several substances were formed. One of these substances was also the substance of our bodies. This substance, when formed, had no coherent shape. Then, with the passing of eons and the continuation of random combinations, once again order resulted from chaos and some of the substances arranged themselves into an orderly shape - the shape of our bodies. The substance was of course, lifeless. It probably lay lifeless for several more eons until, on pure chance, a bolt of lightning hit it. Electricity coursed through it, and this electricity did strange things to it. It gave sentience and motion to the substance.

That was the first being, the father of us all. Once he became alive, he took control of what so far had been a random process. He began gathering and giving shape to the substances. He discovered how to create electricity and he also discovered other sources of power. With these power sources, he gave life to the images he had assembled. In short, he created more beings like himself, who then helped him to create still more, till the world was populated by our like.

That is my hypothesis about our origin. Tell me honestly. Isn't it a beauty? And where does the so-called Maker come into it?

In conclusion, ladies and gentlemen, I firmly believe that us robots came into being by ourselves as I have described, and the myth of Man, the Maker, is just that - a myth.


Continue Reading
Further Recommendations

ardangani1: This is what we need now... this is what our world needs now. This scenario is very possible in the future. Do we need to wait for these wars to happen before we wake up? This story is worth sharing to all people of the world.PS: I noticed many times the misuse of words set and sit.

Shyam Peri: Good read very well written plot was good and build up was excellent hope he concludes well as he started

dasdasd4124123123123: ">2

Taylor Meyer: Very well written and a great story. I hope there is a second one!

Becky Story: I cant put it down. Intriguing ,a who done it,with twits an turns. I would recommend this book to anyone who even remotely thinks that these ''gifts'' are real. I believe !!

Badda Bop Rangtang: Honestly wasn't sure if I would like it. But now I can't stop reading it!!!!

carl foster: Great book so far.love the interesting storyline,and characters

Ukamaka Aniagu: I love everything about the novel but not so much about the ending. I didn't like how the novel end. The author should have soften Iris hearth a little towards Remus.

Trixxxie: This is a really good book, I can't stop reading!

More Recommendations

switzer m: The only criticism I have about this book is it at times it just needs to be audited there what right way it was confusing when they kept saying the Camille with Jane and Jane was Camille's mother and yeah so is a bit confusing if you're really into it you know exactly what's going on but if you'...

Nicholas Delkeskamp: So far loving it! Some spelling and grammar issues but the story is great. If you love the avatar, you'll love this book

Smriti Ahuja: I liked the character of box the most. The aura of sector 16 seems fabulous. It is defined so well.

R Irick: I really enjoyed this story. I feel some of it could have been detailed better or maybe laid out better, but overall was a good read.

Arnold Marques: Easy read. Space related always gets me hooked.

jim lennard: What a story, takes me a while to get into a novel bit this one had me almost from the word go, can't wait for future chapters or stories keep up the great work, thankyou.

About Us

Inkitt is the world’s first reader-powered book publisher, offering an online community for talented authors and book lovers. Write captivating stories, read enchanting novels, and we’ll publish the books you love the most based on crowd wisdom.