My philosophical ideas 3

MY PHILOSOPHICAL IDEAS 3

Antonio Pinto Renedo

© Author, layout and cover design:

Antonio Pinto Renedo

Published in December 2017

Revised in 2019

INDEX

CHAPTER 1 - MEDICINE

Tips for insomnia

Tips cough

Advice against gastroenteritis

Skin protection

Spring and irritability

The perfect man

CHAPTER 2 - POLICY

The batterer

The job

Lefts and rights

The fallacy of multiculturalism

Most false

Racial integrity

The real superiority

Social justice

The submissive woman

Law and Freedom

The miscegéphobes

Mental parasites

Refugees or invaders

Men or insects

A hypocritical society

CHAPTER 3 - SCIENCE

Evil and hunting instinct

The shape of the spirit

The fallacy of cryonics

The personality of a psychopath

Spirit and genetics

Forgetfulness

The architecture of the cosmos

Times in space

Artificial intelligence

Safe housing

CHAPTER 4 - FILOSOFÍA

Mind over matter

The sweetness of poverty

The myth of Adam and Eve

The road to the light

The childcare

Lying and man

Jesus’ death

Both riches

False myths

Universal justice

The book of seven seals

My own experience

FOREWORD

In this third part of my philosophical ideas, I will try to continue to deepen those aspects that have been pending or recently clarified in my previous books. This book is formed with the collection of articles published on my blog (The road to the new era). With these books I try to show that through meditation can break the limitations of the times in which we live and explore time and space. Actually, all the articles in this book represent a greater or lesser extent a philosophical approach to life and the universe, but I considered it appropriate to divide them into four main areas for its greater similarity of content. My books are primarily the result of a search, because in life one can simply believe what they tell and live passively, or take advantage of the creative potential that every living thing has to design a better world, I have chosen the second option.

This book has been translated from the original Spanish version.

CHAPTER 1 - MEDICINE

TIPS INSOMNIA

The first thing to do about insomnia is to understand that our body is a machine that needs to be respected, so we must accept that does not always work as well as we would like, i.e. it is not necessary to resort to drugs ever our body is out of the most desirable guidelines. In a situation of insomnia must understand that in many cases the problem occurs because of a concern in this case is logical that we can not sleep, so if that problem requires our attention, it is best to give it and have patience, because in these cases the dream usually back the next day. In any case, if after a few hours of lying is not possible to sleep, it’s best to get up and stay a while in an upright position so that the blood down from the head, for long remain awake in horizontal position may cause an increase in blood pressure in the brain with consequent onset of headache, then drink some water may be appropriate for its cooling effect. If after returning to bed insomnia persists, it is best to dress and sitting on a couch to rest, because in this way the already mentioned headache problems are prevented. Normally in this situation usually comes sleep in the last moments of the night and although not the same as being in bed at least rest and prevent greater evils. Another possible cause of insomnia is the south wind in spring, in this case, insomnia occurs because the body is used to the cold and the arrival of sudden heat causes like causing effect coffee on the body, just the opposite of what happens in autumn. In this case as in the above, it is best to avoid the rush and let our body adapts itself, without forcing chemicals, because certainly after a few days, everything will return to normal.

TIPS COUGH

We all know how annoying it coughs, but what few know is that persistent cough in many cases is not only the result of an infection but from our own reckless behavior. Because often the mistake of coughing whenever scratchy throat is committed, and what people do not understand is that when coughing a vicious circle whereby more sore throat which in turn causes more coughing is generated is generated. In this case as in most diseases we ourselves can make the solution easily, when the sore throat begins, just have to put up a minute without coughing, and after that short time the itch disappear and throat will return to normal. There is only one case in which a moderate cough can be useful, and that is when mucus are formed in the bronchi, in this case it is useful to expel the outside, but in other situations coughing whenever scratchy throat only causes more itching and irritation. Another suitable measure to avoid cough is never to breathe through his mouth, for the reason that normally breathe through the nose is that it is no mechanism to heat the air and to prevent microbes pass into the lungs, but when breathe through your mouth this preventive measure does not act and facilitates respiratory diseases attack us.

TIPS AGAINST GASTROENTERITIS

This disease is one of the most annoying attacking our digestive system and is caused by a virus, this virus has as main food source our own food, so the best way to kill it is drastically reducing our food intake this does not mean we should stop eating, but limit ourselves to a smaller amount of food until our body to produce the antibodies needed to kill the virus and start to feel better. Actually the fact of reducing food intake has momentarily why harm our health, since the body has essential reserves accumulated as fat under the skin or in organs like the liver. It is also recommended that food ingested during those days of fasting for the duration of the disease are of vegetable and low-fat, because they are easier to digest.

The man is too naive to think that all health problems should be solved with drugs, medicines are sometimes necessary, but we must understand that generally most diseases are only the symptom of an imbalance in the body caused by our own unhealthy habits of life and therefore the solution is not to take medicine but to eliminate those causes that produce disease.

It is true that our body is not always able alone to defeat the virus, but it is also true that the main goal of pharmaceutical companies is not to cure disease but to sell drugs, and sometimes these drugs cause more problems than they solve therefore it is essential to consider the self-healing ability of our body and lead a healthy life.

THE SKIN

Many people worry about losing your skin hydration and consequently money spent on cosmetics. But they do not understand it is that in most cases are themselves the cause of this dryness. The cause is the excessive use made of degreasers. People do not understand that our body naturally causes the amount of oil that the skin needs, but we mistakenly use degreasers every time we wash without realizing that thus eliminating this natural layer that protects the skin. Therefore the solution is simple, we only use degreasing soaps in those cases where we have stained with grease, and still must use a moderate amount to just remove excess fat from the skin and not all. Because it is itself stupid degreasers filled skin causing it is dry, and then use expensive cosmetics to restore hydration before you have removed. We must not let fool us sellers of cosmetics because the skin does not need to be added or proteins, or vitamins, much less false rejuvenating products, because everything the skin needs is a healthy diet and respecting their own nature.

SPRING AND IRRITABILITY

Many people happens to feel more irritable than normal during the spring, I think the cause is a virus called herpes among other organs acts in the brain, a characteristic sign of their presence is the feeling of discomfort to light of the sun. These symptoms occur in spring because during winter cold maintained lethargic many types of viruses and bacteria that are relived with increasing temperature, once the body itself generates the right to combat this type of virus antibodies sensations become normal. This virus can cause nervousness, irritability and insomnia, but in no case can prevent us to act with discretion and objectivity, for those who are usually wise not change the fact this feeling slightly nervous. Possibly all be over after a slight headache. Another consequence that can cause the spring virus is depression, this depression is not only the result of the discomfort caused by infections, but may partly be caused deliberately by our own body as a natural anti-inflammatory method, since depression can cause a relaxing effect, which helps to reduce fever and discomfort, so you could say that sometimes can be therapeutic. Moderate depression can also be useful in the event of an upset or nervous disorder, it can protect the brain from neurological damage act is against the tensions that are usually associated with these emotional states.

THE PERFECT MAN

One could say that today man has already reached its maximum level of progress as far as the genetic aspect is concerned, however this does not mean that all people have the same level of genetic quality, since the presence of hereditary diseases they are widespread across the globe. This is an outstanding account for all governments in the world because the more you delay in taking action, the greater suffering for the population. It could be said that at present, only fifteen percent of citizens are free of these diseases and therefore it would be desirable to create an eradication program that completely eliminated. In this way the man of the future may be genetically better, but not because it has evolved, but because they have eliminated all those genetic defects that hinder the development of their own potential. And hereditary diseases like morbid obesity or Alzheimer’s disease could be eradicated forever, giving mankind a great boost social progress. One of the methods that could be used for genetic correction that would prohibit having more than one child to couples who carry inherited diseases, in contrast allow more children to couples who were free of these diseases. In the event that a couple had set the limit of one child per couple, but the son did not inherit any disease, then it could be free of this restriction and would become part of the population group considered healthy, this is possible because the that one parent carries a hereditary disease, it does not mean that all your children have to necessarily inherit. With this system one child per couple, the number of people who had genetic diseases would decrease gradually until it disappears. This system would apply only to a fraction of the population at the same time, starting with the most serious illnesses and once these are removed after the milder happen. Another method that could be used to eliminate genetic diseases would select the sick genes and remove them from the eggs, and later replace them with healthy ones, although this method is far more complicated than the previous one and also the risk of causing mutations runs unwanted.

Since ancient times there is a natural method of correcting genetic flaws that works by our own ability to mate choice. This means that when a person decides that the couple that will make your family be beautiful or well, actually it does is encourage their own children are. Because when we choose the person you’re going to have children, what we are doing is to determine what features will inherit them. Thus sexual selection is essential to decide which qualities will future generations. This shows that the desire to have a beautiful and healthy couple is not only desirable but our duty, because that favor the progress of future generations and avoid unnecessary suffering to our descendants to prevent such unfortunate inherit the genetic diseases. However, this natural system is not foolproof, because many people are not able to know that hereditary diseases transports, so set up a program to eradicate these diseases conducted by specialists would be useful to ensure genetic health future generations.

So far I have referred to the perfection of man on the physical aspect, but we must not forget that man is the union of body and spirit and that only when humanity complete their development in the moral aspect, you have completed the essential stage progress and it may be considered truly evolved. In recent centuries scientific progress has made great progress, but that technological progress will not continue indefinitely at the pace has today, because what we call progress is rather a process of evolution in which mankind has to develop those potentials it deserves to have, and when that scientific progress occurs almost ended or significantly reduced. When it reaches that point mankind will have completed their essential stage of evolution and consequently the pace of social and technological change will be reduced. It is as if he had graduated from a university hypothetical galactic, so it will become an adult planet in the universe. Those who believe that technological progress will continue indefinitely at current rates to be able to provide everything that we wish to prove profoundly naive. For the purpose of progress is that man is made as being scientifically advanced and with immense technology, but limited to its place in the universe, because everything is not possible, man can do many things, but only those that make sense within of natural laws.

Arguably today modern man is like having a perfect body, but governed by an imperfect mind the balance between the two values will only come when humanity ends its moral progress, which is far more delayed than technological. This is because in order to progress philosophically a certain degree of privacy and concentration, which at first seems to contradict the factors necessary for life, for to live usually work is needed needs to be based on social relations and extroverted life. Therefore arguably is only possible interest devote philosophy when all other social aspects such as attention to work or children are resolved. This problem does not occur when it comes to achieving technological progress, because a man can live without difficulties dedicated to research work, but it is much more difficult if it is what it is to live philosophy. Therefore in order that man may be perfect in both the flat material or physical, and spiritual or philosophical level, it is necessary to delve into the world of philosophy and learn to understand the universe and discover their own creative potential for and to eradicate the prejudices that prevent you from completing its evolution. A mistake that is often repeated, is to believe that the man of the future will be highly evolved technological aspect, but not in the moral aspect, but this would not make sense, because progress is the path that runs from darkness to light and precisely characterized by providing light to the shadows and truth to lies. Therefore, the man of the future will be perfect in physical appearance, having a body free of disease, but will also be perfect in the spiritual aspect, for having eradicated all those unbalanced behaviors that keep you from being happy. Of course the man of the future also was wrong at times and will live changes, but when I say it will be perfect I mean that will be over the essential process of development, which will become an evolved being of the cosmos.

CHAPTER 2 - POLICY

THE BATTERER

Extreme nationalism is like an abusive husband, when he thinks he can no longer demand more the state performs as possible aggression is an attempt to secede in order to destroy the country. It seems that the more you give in to their demands, the greater the virulence of their acts, as does a spoiled child, because it is logical that a moderate nationalist subsides when the state shown considerate of your requests, but truth is that radical nationalists his people do not care and politics is only a means to conceal their wickedness. Similarly, an abusive husband is addicted to mistreat, is to entertain, and when he learns that his wife will leave holds the greatest possible aggression is murder. It is as if trying to accumulate in a single act all attacks that would plan to do and can not. They always look for a victim who attack with which to boost your ego. The Nazis used the Jews, nationalists used the state and abusers use to their partners, watch the straw in your neighbor’s eye and forget the beam in their own. An abuser tries to dehumanize his victim so that others eyebrows that abuse and not realize that the perpetrator is a scoundrel. Actually a batterer has no ideology, because ideology is to hurt others, so always join extremist groups, because they will be offered bloodshed course disguised as legitimate act.

THE JOB

It is true that the work helps us to realize ourselves as individuals, but it is false that the more you work in the day is best for our health, this belief leads only to make man into a mere instrument of the exploiters. Someday people will understand that besides the work should be the main instrument to ensure happiness, either by gains acquired either by the entertainment itself that work provides, for man is made by nature to work, but of course in his good measure. Gradually humanity understand that it is through work and resources that science gives us as to achieve happiness and not through war or violence.

It is also important to understand that only a coordinated system can be guaranteed social rights, i.e. only when the number of inhabitants matches the available jobs can achieve full employment, it is also necessary that the birth rate is the necessary to ensure the renewal of the population, this rate is equivalent to about two children per couple, so it is necessary for governments to enhance birth when scarce, but also penalized when excessive, it makes no sense to have a child if it lacks the resources to maintain it, nor makes sense to allow uncontrolled immigration, which causes a drop in wages and number of unemployed, as the limited employment. You also need to understand that if both men and women are dedicated to working nobody will care to have and raise children, feminist such thinking as is raised today is completely wrong, it proposes that the ideal woman is one that has as its ultimate goal to emulate men, and therefore interest birth is being replaced by the profit motive and social prestige in the workplace, this way of thinking is leading Western society to its own self -extermination. Therefore, it is necessary to understand that men and women should be complementary and not competing in the same social functions, because it was nature that decided it was the woman who gave birth and suckle their children, this does not mean that It must be considered inferior to men, since both sexes are actually a specialization of nature with the same rights to be free and happy, but with different social functions. The intelligent man is one who is fond of his wife because he is the best ally you can have, their tasks may be different, but not to be considered as implying the right to mistreat your partner, a marriage relationship must be understood as mutual and voluntary agreement in which each member assumes performing different tasks for the common good, but never questioned the right of both spouses to have the same right to be free and happy.

It is also important to understand that is healthier work little long to work hard for a short time, it is necessary to understand more work as entertainment than as an obligation and design jobs thinking of the welfare of workers, as the idleness leads to illness and premature death, as the energy that food provides cause disease if they are not channeled through work, therefore retirement as currently understood is an error derived from the belief that work is something wrong. The fact that tends to displace people over work is the main cause of youth and people tend to hide their age with hair dyes to be ashamed of age overestimate. Therefore, it is necessary to return to older people the place they had in antiquity, and use its wisdom in the work as counselors workers and management positions.

LEFT AND RIGHT

It is pathetic to see how the political formations are mainly divided between left and right, as if it were only true one and not the other. Already existed in ancient times this kind of ideological divisions between the states of Athens and Sparta, Athens and Sparta represented the left to the right. Athens represented democracy, but democracy hypocritical, because it was only for a few, while there was an immense number of slaves and people without political rights. At present it is considered to Sparta as its ideological rival, but actually had no major differences with Athens, as though it was in many similar aspects to a military dictatorship, however it was not an absolutist monarchy, because he had the power shared between the king and éforos, but like Athens was a highly slave state, so as to define some Democrats and others do not, it’s really simplistic. Athens defended freedom of opinion and democracy for the few, but in the social and economic sphere was an unfettered slave model, which only took into account the market and self-interest, but with little moral value. Sparta had less ideological freedom, but promoted equality between citizens with civil rights and had a great concept of race, ethics and morality, unlike Athens. The ideal Greek state would have been the one who had an appreciation for democracy and free markets in Athens, but that wealth would raise as a means to a higher cause, as represented Sparta. When finished World War II, the social model that prevailed in the West was the Athenian style, characterized the political aspect by not libertarian democracy apparent, libertine, where the motto is laissez-faire, while politicians get rich with public money, a model in which citizens are used as puppets, as only allowed a symbolic political participation, consisting only choose their leaders, but without any direct influence on the laws, because the real power they have a minority of politicians and businessmen. On the economic side it is characterized by a materialistic approach, in which the only important thing is the market, with little or no regard for ethics or morality. At present, the political groups of the left, are essentially ideologists, i.e. offering everything that the workers wanted, but without raising any effective economic measure, since in most cases lack sufficient training and when in power often they cause more damage to the economy that benefits its little realism, as was the example of communism. They complain of political corruption, but they are primarily responsible for that criminals do not serve their sentences, then propose a ridiculous penalties in proportion to the crimes committed, thereby causing impunity. They complain of low wages, but they are the culprits by favoring illegal immigration. In the moral aspect, the left is proclaimed contrary to religion, because it confuses religion with religious organization, it does not understand that religion is what differentiates man from animals. Right instead tries to show an image of religiosity lacking, therefore, it makes a pact with religious organizations so that these would provide a moral alibi with which to continue exploiting the people without being noticed. At the end people it ends up confusing one with the other and mistakenly blame religion for the crimes committed by religious organizations. They do not understand that religion is primarily a form of philosophy, while religious organizations which attempt is appropriate that philosophy to gain power. Commit the audacity to ascribe to themselves the exclusive communication between God and man, denying citizens the right to speak freely. Thus they seek to control their minds in an act of supreme hypocrisy. Political right-wing groups aspire to power, especially because they believe they belong by nature, believed privileged, unlike leftist politicians are pragmatists, because although dominated by ambition, they are more realistic economically, because of its more knowledge in business management. Really misconception is that the truth belongs only to some and nothing to others, because ideally create a world with ideological expectations of the left, but with pragmatism and economic knowledge of the right. Politicians on each side incite citizens against their opponents, but like politicians of ancient Greece just covet power for themselves, and refuse equally to create a genuine democracy, namely that the laws are decided by citizens and not by those selfish politicians as now.

THE FALLACY OF MULTICULTURALISM

What a big mistake is to defend the existence of a multicultural society, because there is really nothing more than an authentic culture that is the truth, therefore, we must strive to reject those mistaken customs however much be categorized as ancestral traditions or cultures. Of course it is necessary to respect the free will of each person and each country so they can find the truth for themselves, but it is also our duty to refuse to collaborate with all that is wrong. Today there are those who insist to regard as the most natural thing in the world to mix races and cultures, some located in a developmental level of the Stone Age to contemporary society, but such a thing is an attack against progress because the fact that one culture is superior to the other does not imply that those who have lived in the most backward culture are to be folded without the superior culture of the more advanced countries. For those immigrants who come from countries with these primitive cultures obviously not confined to accept the culture of their hosts just because they are told that it is superior, because they thought that true culture is yours, because even being wrong, not they want to recognize. For every race and every culture has its own distinct natural inertia and this inevitably leads to the development of conflicts between the two communities. Because it is logical, it is that two peoples with different cultural level evolve without mixing, to make it a more harmonious development process as possible. Because in reality there is only a culture worthy of appreciation and that culture is derived from science and progress, and an advanced society technologically can not make the mistake of mixing with races and cultures much more backward than yours for risk social disintegration that entails. An example of this we have with blacks in the United States. They were taken to that country for centuries to exploit them as slaves, but even today the social fusion is still a pending issue, however much media such as film try to convince us otherwise. Once slavery disappeared, they began to see as a nuisance and as a result laws such as the legalization of firearms were created, with the vile intention to carry out a campaign of extermination of the race under the qualification acts of self-defense, that is intended to be used the excuse of defense against crime as a pretext for justifiable the disappearance of as many of these people, considering that the number of offenders black is greater than White race. That is, once they ceased to be used as slaves, they tried to eliminate rather than recognizing their land rights. That’s when the transfer of blacks to Africa was proposed or when this infamous law was created to allow the extermination of blacks dedicated to crime. Therefore, the only correct the problem of multiculturalism present in the world solution is not racial or cultural miscegenation, but respect for each race and territorial integrity. For countries like the United States it would be fair that land surrender to citizens of every race to create their own independent states, where every race and every culture can evolve free and at your own pace, thus preventing conflicts arising from pretend to mix the past and the future in the same geographical space. Because our bodies are not different by chance, but is the result of biological progress gained over thousands of years, a biological progress but will not be seen with the naked eye is present in every cell of our body and we will adapt gradually to the various scientific scenarios that cause changes. For this reason miscegenation makes no sense, each culture having a different level of progress. Because interbreeding actually intended only to economic exploitation that benefits few but hurts most by causing an inevitable social maladjustment. It is true that all the races belong to the same species, but it is also true that they are different and should follow different paths, especially if you also are at different levels of technological evolution. The truth is that each race was made by nature to live in different climates and among their peers where each individual must progress without this be why keep the good relationship between all races of Earth. Because in reality, many of the politicians who support miscegenation just use it as a pretext to justify their own imperialist campaigns. It is therefore necessary that the major military powers assume that they must respect the political independence of every race, so they can develop free and without outside interference. A nation can not be just a sum of people, it must be a people with their own culture and rationale. Someday only exist in the world one race and one culture, but not by crossbreeding or by the imposition of anyone, but by the evolution of each race to truth, because truth there is only one and when society understands this reality and abandon their mistaken beliefs, the world will become increasingly similar. It is therefore necessary that all races evolve free and without interference of others, so that each can evolve as your own natural rhythm, because the fate of all races is to become equal when the progress of technology allow the weather in cities across the earth is the same, then these will evolve to be identical. And just as there will only be a culture which is the culture of truth, but this will only be possible when all the false myths are permanently expelled from the Earth and then the world can live in peace, with the light that science can provide.

FAKE MAJORITY

In the current political systems so-called democracies, it is considered that the majority vote represents the feelings of the citizens, but it is important to note that psychopaths politicians and scoundrels always resort to the support of the majority as an alibi argument to justify its own dictatorship. Indeed, all political parties resort to deception and lies as a way to get power, but there are cases where this goes so far as was the Nazi era or dictatorial models that occur frequently in the world. Another example of vile manipulation are some nationalist movements such as those in Spain, because they use the tactic of provoking the state with the hope that it will react excessively so we can charge him with assault on their rights, all in order to increase with lies citizen support, another of his tactics is to try to seize education in schools, in order to instill nationalist hatred in the students, hoping that once they become adults give them their votes. Therefore, the essential question is not just what is the meaning of the vote of the citizens, but it is more important to know to what extent the various political forces have manipulated to distort its true sense. Nationalist extremists invent false enemies, like the German Nazis did to the Jews, all in order that people may not realize that they are the real enemies. Because the truth is that psychopaths do not need any reason to do evil because they carry within them, however resort to things like politics only as a way to hide his true personality and give their behavior an appearance of legitimacy that no have.

The truth is that all political forces have a point in their arguments, but keep in mind that progress is to add and not subtract to unite and not separate. Certainly there are cases where political separation of the territories is adequate, especially when there are large differences of race or culture, but it is always better to try to find a deal that will convince everyone, rather than seeking to break sole purpose.

Some think that aggressive nationalism is the result of aggressive states, but Spain is just the opposite, it is precisely the wider is the self-government of autonomy and independence of the regions, where most aggressive is show nationalist parties. This is because in Spain at the beginning of the democratic transition in 1975 opted for a less centralized consistent constitutional model in the so-called proportional system. With this system, it is usual that at the end of the elections the largest party does not reach the number of seats needed to govern, therefore, is forced to compromise with minority parties in most cases nationalist. The problem is that the formation of these agreements is done by these parties blackmail the government do to achieve the gradual destruction of the state. With this system, the nationalist parties gain power that does not correspond to its true dimension, i.e. that end up being the spoiled children of the country, without too much trouble receiving most of the demands they ask. Thus, a political system originally thought to be negotiating and openness, ends up becoming discriminatory for regions not participating in government formation while hostage to a minority parties with an excessively large power. In my opinion, by a majority constitutional system has been chosen, the majority needed to govern could have been obtained by a second vote between the top two parties, thus any regional party would have been able to participate as an associate of these parties, but without exert such a direct influence on the entire state. In addition, this privilege granted by the state nationalists, ends up causing a totalitarian regime and manipulative in their regions against non-nationalists. This is obviously directly because of those national parties in their selfish to obtain the parliamentary majority interest ultimately betraying the rest, but also because of a proportional system that favors discrimination for those communities that are not involved in the formation of the government and so does the opposite of what it should do, which is the promotion of democracy and equality. All this shows that excessive aggressiveness demonstrated by the nationalists is not the result of an alleged abuse by the state as they claim, but rather by the monopoly allowed by the government in its autonomous communities to the point of not recognizing neither law nor Constitution.

RACIAL INTEGRITY

People easily forget that the progress of civilization has always been linked to the integrity of races, an example of this is in the rise of Greece and Rome, these nations became great when they were homogeneous societies. Was the racial likeness what made them strong, and was precisely the expansion of slavery that destroyed them because priority was given to the market on people, the business of dignity, racial miscegenation acted like a wedge into the crack a stone, fracturing progressively. The latest example of this is the United States, this nation grew strongly as a racially pure and most of its immigrants were of European origin, who was also at that time the most developed part of the world, that together with its racial homogeneity gave strong growth as a result of the state, in fact, the policy of that time favored this situation. But its current model pro crossbreeding is taking this country to a lack of direction and erratic both a national and international politics. But perhaps the clearest example we have in the history of Sparta, this same nation that the United States grew strongly as a racially pure, this policy was also favored by the state, however sank to fall into the mistake of promoting slavery, to be more slaves than free citizens. It is impossible for a nation to exist for long periods when the majority of its citizens are slaves, also in the case of Sparta these slaves were natives of the land and therefore of the same race for the Spartans, so it was even more slavery absurd to apply them, considering that if they had been made, there would have been racial difference. The gradual decline of persons entitled to citizenship and ability to participate in the army, triggered an increasingly unstable situation that ended with the sudden collapse of this nation. Unfortunately while Sparta represented the best but also the worst thing a company can have. But today’s society refuses to be self-critical, stunned by the events of the Second World War. This situation of confusion and power vacuum was exploited by immigrants to enter Europe en masse and often violently, but the most absurd of all is that the European authorities reward these invaders giving them economic aid without But they are denied to those who contributed to someday make use of the aid. Society needs to understand that not everything is and that the market is not the only important and that above all is the dignity and culture that race itself represents. History shows that these facts are true, much as contemporary topics that people do not want to see. Society must understand that this corrupt political class is only interested in personal enrichment, not caring the least of society it represents. Great nations like the United States or Rome were mainly created by a society of free peasants who felt love for their homeland and shared the same level of cultural progress, because slavery only serves to provide a wealth vain tyrants. But today’s society is repeating the same mistake of Sparta, creating a system based on a minority of elderly whites maintained by a majority population of slaves or immigrants with deplorable economic conditions system, depending on how you prefer to call. Is being repeated again biblical tower babel, chaos mix of races and cultures, in which the only motto is the selfish interests of the exploiters, but no benefit for other citizens. Society must correct this serious mistake, protecting their racial and cultural identity, returning each race in its proper place, so that in this way better guarantee their rights and can form their own free nations. Because justice is born of equality and not interbreeding, that tyrants seek to impose. Any idea must be respected if done peacefully. Because of the violent people, of any political sign, many times certain ideas are considered misleading and erroneous considered certain, therefore, it is necessary to do an exercise of impartiality and analyze the facts without preconceived ideas.

TRUE SUPERIORITY

Since the end of World War II humanity is confused about the concept of superiority, because due to the crimes of the Nazis that word tends to be associated with evil or abuse of some human beings to others, but the truth is the superiority of some species for others is something that exists in nature without this having to be controversial, it is as acceptable the possibility of the existence of superior species and superior races. Therefore, the fact that there are species or higher races does not have to involve cruelty of some races to the other, because in the case of the human species all races are necessary, because each of them is the consequence of their adaptation to different climates on earth. The truth is that the real superiority is through human and godly behavior as demonstrated, not tyranny, for those who rely on racial grounds to do evil not demonstrate this superiority, but rather the most mediocre impulses and backward own of the most primitive individuals, because despotic behavior are more typical of scoundrels and bandits that superior beings. Therefore, there is nothing dishonorable in believing that a race can be superior to another, but that does not mean that you have the right to mistreat others, for all species and all races have a role on earth and are entitled to be respected and to live in freedom. Because the fact that a race can be superior to another does not imply the right to use other, as though this were true, we are all human beings belong to the same species. The concept of racial superiority can determine differences regarding climate zone on the planet to live or another kind of circumstances, but in no case would entitle preference or servility of some races over others.

SOCIAL JUSTICE

In a developed society it is absurd to have citizens in a situation of social exclusion, as everyone can and should participate in the benefits of the system because there is no reason for a city organized dispenses with any of its members. It is therefore necessary to create a comprehensive system whereby all citizens have the state guarantee to have a housing in which to live and work in that part of social activity. Of course reserve these rights only to those citizens who are nationals legally recognized for this to be possible it is necessary, because otherwise obviously the people of those nations who would not have created these social systems try to benefit from them causing the failure of the system this is therefore not a question of solidarity, but common sense, it is a duty of all nations to create these social systems regardless of their wealth, because solidarity of the state towards its citizens has nothing to do with rent per capita but with human dignity, and therefore those who pass needs in these countries what they have to do is hold their governments policy change rather than trying to seize by force of these social services in countries that if they have. It is therefore necessary that all countries of the world as an essential issue raised its population matches the wealth necessary to maintain the entire population and avoid passing necessity. This would be accomplished by creating laws birth control. Another key issue is to be clear that all social assistance should always be returned by the recipient through a program of work for the state, because otherwise it will be encouraging picaresque those who merely collect the state but refusing to work. Therefore those who do not agree to work for the state to repay the aid can not live by begging, because in a social system in which no one is unassisted right and logical that begging is prohibited.

THE SUBMISSIVE WOMAN

To make it possible coexistence between the couple is necessary that women understand that this coexistence is only possible if she shows submissive man, this submission in no way be construed as slavery, because this situation only makes sense if she accepts him voluntarily. In every ship captain necessary, and every government a president, therefore, in every marriage is also necessary to have who perform the function of command is necessary. So the idea of submission only makes sense understood as a voluntary assignment of women to men in exchange for consideration, which if not given, it would be logical that it requires the separation. The intelligent man is one who is affectionate with your partner and puts interest in her to have everything you need, so the control function only in marriage must be understood as a democratic presidential task and not a dictatorship. It is a collaborative effort between the two spouses to take the family along, so it is correct to understand that gender roles are different, but that association is voluntary for both and only the result of a mutual commitment. Because it is nature in its great wisdom which decided that each sex is different, so they have different roles in life, that function in no way be seen as inferior but only as different. The man represents the sun, the center command. The woman represents earth, water, spirituality. Both are the expression in human form gives the bipolarity of the cosmos, both equally important, both with the same right to be happy, but also two different roles in life. Therefore, the idea of submission of women to men should be seen more as a game designed to give stability to marriage as something that deprive anyone of their rights, as the duty of man is to take into account the views of his family in all his actions, and decide between all the actions to be carried out by consensus. This should be a reciprocal relationship in which the woman gives the command to man, but with the condition that the use to seek the welfare of his family, so the belief that one has to be better than the other it is erroneous as a fair relationship is one in which both must be equally satisfied. Is that man should preside over the marriage but to serve his family, therefore the question of who serves whom no longer depend on the view with which you look.

The current marriage model, inspired by feminist myths, has led to a situation of enormous stress many men, the provoke a permanent sense of insecurity, because in case of separation law usually gives generally all assets of the couple women, ordinary housing, children and much of the salary husband, creating in man the feeling that the law is working with them in their own humiliation, especially if we consider that in many cases this leads inevitably poverty, lacking most of the money men needed to maintain the level of expenditure that are required by law. Therefore, it would be good to give such separation, the law is consistent and truly considered as such, giving both spouses equal right to enjoy the goods of the couple, or the right to raise their children on an equal footing. Logically, with the exception of those cases was demonstrated that the negligent attitude of one of them during the marital cohabitation. For if a law is discriminatory and seeks the humiliation of men, then you are preventing them rebuild their lives, then creating a situation of obvious injustice of which they certainly blame their wives even being innocent.

Feminism is guilty of sowing discord in couples, to induce women to believe that their duty in life is to compete with men for the same social functions, when that is not the case. A marriage first and foremost must be an agreement between two people by each spouse to specialize in different tasks in order to be just as happy, but without implying that it means having to perform the same functions.

An intelligent man is one who worries that his wife did not miss anything, to fill it with care and takes into account their views to be happy, but who think that a woman is better than man just for the sake of It is, proves to be deeply naive. The feminist myth that man is indebted to women, has led many women believe they can be bad with men without feeling pangs of conscience. Certainly there are things that should change both by men and by women, but it is also true that nature created the sexes so that each specialize in different tasks, not to favor one over the other, but for the good of all.

The key that makes sense that women accept give the man the Administrator role of the family or in other words to accept cede the control function, is in the fact that the essential purpose of life does not have to necessarily obtaining positions of political relevance or otherwise, but to achieve maximum happiness, and in the case of women that happiness is linked indissolubly to its realization as a mother and housewife as main tasks, thereby the transfer of command to the man or his greater presence in the workplace, need not imply that women have to be less happy, especially considering that a marriage is a strong union in which the benefits of this relationship must be for both spouses alike. This means that the control function of man in marriage should only be aimed to stabilize the relationship, but in no way be taken to this assignment in command implies that women should lose their freedom or may be less happy than man, for that transfer of leadership must always be democratic, i.e. taking into account the views of women and always chasing the good of the couple. Therefore, the participation of women in the workplace must be regarded as perfectly acceptable, but as long as his task as mother and housewife has been sufficiently satisfied. Nature decided that the men and women were different, not one is less happy than the other, but because their specialization in different tasks can offer a happier life for both.

Unfortunately many of the laws that have been created in Europe to promote the integration of women in the labor market have only served to provoke a sharp decline in the birth rate to critical levels, all with the sole purpose of getting the female vote heavily influenced by feminist organizations. This results from the merely utopian but false belief that women should imitate all men to be held as a person. As a result, in countries where most have implemented these policies the birth rate has fallen to levels insufficient to acceptable population renewal, but politicians keep quiet about it and just propose to fix mediocre formulas, such as paying women some money to stay in state, rather than tackling the problem at its root, which is to recognize that the feminist project for women based on mere imitation of man, is completely wrong.

Feminism tries to convince women that man is bad just for being different, but the truth is that the greatest treasure that a man can have is a woman who wants really, why those who mistreat his wife is not to be sexist, it is that they are stupid.

Feminists use the word equality in a frivolous manner, as would have us believe that equality between men and women is only possible as long as they perform the same functions in life, but such a thing is absurd, because the concept of equality is only applicable peer and evidently men and women are not. It makes no sense to demand equality for what is different when really it is, because the word discrimination can only be applied when starting from the same situations the deal is different, but when it is clear that men and women are different is also logical to think their roles in life can be so without that is why have considered discriminatory treatment, would simply different tasks because they are different. Therefore, true equality that it is fair claim for women is as to their right to be happy and to be treated with dignity, like men, want to do, because women are no less important than men only by being different, and therefore they should have the same right to be respected and to live freely. Not to be confused different with worse because the fact that men and women are different, can justify that their lives are different, but are just as important for the progress of humanity.

LAW AND FREEDOM

In any organized society there need to be laws to coordinate the population so that the system can work. From a certain point of view one might think that this limits their own freedom, but an advanced society can not exist without the existence of common rules in cases where circumstances affecting the entire population. Therefore, the key to which there is no contradiction between the existence of mandatory laws and the right of free will would be the development of a consistent voting system and allow every citizen to propose any changes it deems necessary. This voting system would not only elect political leaders, but above all serve so that every citizen could make proposals to consider appropriate or to change existing laws. This system also could be done by using internet so that the interaction between the political system and citizens were constant and truly democratic. With this voting system, politicians might have the initiative in proposing the actions to take, because that’s their job, those citizens who were as they would have to do nothing, because their abstention would be counted as support for the proposal the state, but to be against, the proposal would be rejected if the number of votes against exceeds half the existing census. Thus citizen freedom of choice would have its maximum expression in this system of voting constant. The laws emanating from this system of voting would be mandatory for everyone, but everyone could participate in it was appropriate to make changes.

Once this system was implemented, manipulations and political intrigue, since power no longer belong to politicians as now would end. Once citizens had the final say in deciding a law there would be no reason for full campaign of promises and lies, because things will not be decided in a single vote every few years, but every one of laws depend on the direct decision of all citizens. Additionally, this ideal system, the profession of political opportunism not be subject to or adherence to parties, but it would be a college career like any other.

THE MISCEGÉPHOBES

When World War II ended, the world became aware of the atrocities committed by the Nazis in their campaign of extermination against the Jews, the psychological impact that occurred, along with the fact that the war had won Germany’s enemies, He led a campaign to discredit anything that had to do with the Nazis, on the one hand that the world knew the horrors caused by them, but also to accept factly the existence of new masters of the world represented in the United States and its allies. It is that it was just to alert the excesses committed by the Nazis during the war, but also to create the false belief that every conceivable evils are applicable to Nazism and every imaginable benefits they are applicable to the winners of war. This is what the two military blocs that were left after the war the United States and the Soviet Union, tried to instill in the minds of citizens, but, as expected, also accusing the other block of the same criticisms applied to Nazis, to try to undermine his power and achieve world domination.

But, as history shows, wars are not among truths or lies, but between nations that try to prevail against the other almost always to promote the benefit of its ruling classes aside workers. Citizens are told that their duty is to participate in the war, but the benefits always goes to the rich, therefore, is a serious mistake to think that the fact that the Nazis lost the war implies that they are wrong at all such as in opposing racial mixtures. The trouble is that when an army is defeated the facts of the war are recounted telling the truth about the crimes committed by them, but concealing the reasons or arguments in his defense might have. At the same time, after the war, the victorious powers were devoted to conceal their own embarrassments such as the effects of the atomic bombs brought on civilians in Japan, because of the radiation, or also the campaign of harassment Arab world carried out by the US in Iraq and Syria in order to wrest from Russia all allied countries, while supporting Israel, in a clear example of imperialism. There seems to be an unjustified need to provoke wars with which to pay US arms companies for their financial support to political parties.

In addition, after the end of the war, it was instilled in the collective mind that all who defend that races should live without mixing had to be forcibly sick, and so the word xenophobia, thus invented would no longer be necessary to explain why those who advocated these ideas were wrong, it was enough to use this word and everyone would know that this is a taboo subject and that those go inside it will be considered sick or enemies of the ruling power. Thus the victors of the war served the fear of the Nazis as a way to control the population and to justify its own global hegemony and its campaign of imperialism, i.e. that citizens are frightened against others to hide their own crimes. But the most pathetic of all is that this method of intimidation and alarm is the same used by the Nazis against the Jews and now use the victors of the war to scare citizens and that they are more easily subject to its own global hegemony.

All this at the end of the day are merely strategies of mental manipulation to hide the truth, I prevent citizens think, because the better you opine about Germany or the Nazis, logically less fear will have to oppose the hegemony imposed by the victors of the Second World War. Proof of this are the many military bases that the US has spread worldwide.

It would therefore be logical to think that if those who peacefully oppose racial mixtures they should call contemptuously xenophobes, then the logical thing would be to consider that those who support the interbreeding would have to call them miscegéphobes, i.e. those who fear and hysterically opposed to those who argue that the races must maintain their integrity without mixing, because there are cases where you get to act violently or resignation of those who defend these ideas peacefully required. It is as if he had implanted a single thought, which was forbidden to deviate from the official policy on the matter in the least, it being understood that those who defend the thesis of racial superiority or opposes racial mixtures necessarily it has to be like the Nazis and therefore can be insulted and lynched without fear of public criticism. Today is socially accepted that man is superior to the monkey and yet that does not mean that is why those who believe that defending the monkey should be maltreated or exterminated, then, why it is considered that those who oppose racial mixtures evil necessarily intended for other races? Clearly this is a prefabricated thought so interested to consolidate the new rule of the victors of the war, a domain that seeks to impose saying that the fact of supporting miscegenation makes them different from the Nazis and thus legitimizes them as they to create a world empire to his taste, but really its purpose is to make the working class in a mixture of mestizos slaves in a chaotic and full of class differences in society.

The miscegéphobes intended to defend the virtues of miscegenation but how will you explain this to the victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants? As the terrorist attacks and all kinds of violations and crimes. Or who have lost their jobs because their bosses have given to them. How can they think that a person who enters a country violating the law once inside the will to respect? Man is condemned to repeat the same mistakes indefinitely if it just follows the topics defended by the victorious powers of war. It is true that reject these topics involves sailing against the current, but it is also true that truth is only one and does not comply with who wins or who loses a war, but is neutral and is divided equally among all the contenders.

THE MENTALLY PARASITES

It is striking that in this contemporary society the truth is almost always the opposite of what it seems, it is not the truth what is sought but the appearance of truth, not honesty seeks only to show to others the image is thought to they value.

This is a materialistic society in which it is common boast of dignity when it is lacking, where citizens seem to give more importance to the superfluous that truly valuable. It is at this cusp of lies which is more important to doubt what they say and are precisely those who feel disillusioned with the world today and those immunized are more likely to discover scammers.

In this present moment, in which more is presumed not to be prejudiced, is the more you have, these prejudices act as genuine mental parasites, they do not provide any benefit to those who have. An example of this is the way the film shows today’s world, it seems that the writers had some gods they serve that they strictly set the tone of his scripts to the point of making his films in unpleasant stories , bitter and intended only to please the most radical social movements, such is curious to see how today tends to be placed on the roles of heads to blacks, so as not to be accused of racism but what the viewer does not understand is that they are only supporting roles, because unlike real life their salaries are lower than those charged by white actors, although they do not play roles of chiefs, however their roles themselves are main and hence better paid. All in order to pretend normality does not exist and serve those false gods that seems to be delivered this hypocritical society, those false gods proposing feminism or pro miscegenation as something ideal, when only leading to self-destruct Western society, we are told that there are no racial differences when even a child two years distinguishes therefore critics gleefully those who defend the racial integrity do not realize that they are criticizing God, for it was God or nature, as preferred call, who decided to put a different race on every continent, and all that work thousands of years of evolution this hypocritical society is destroying. The screenwriters trying to create an unrealistic view of the world and thus satisfy current fashion, based on supporting miscegenation therefore propose a relationship between blacks and whites in the black always it appears in his films as the faithful servant of the white, always ready to make mere complement this, as if it were only a loyal and loving dog, as if a black could never be evil, or at least not to the extent that target. All in order to suggest the white man to accept miscegenation under the premise that the black man will always serve as an instrument of their whims and not as a genuine free man. Since the power this view of things is favored to achieve an apparent calm in the social mass, with respect to interracial tensions, so that the state can take care of an imperialist campaign that try to achieve profitability material, its victory over the Nazis, but at the cost of sacrificing the quality of life of citizens by ignoring the serious social problems that this policy creates. It is ultimately to show an apparently different from the Nazis public image, but having the same goal as them, which is world domination.

Another example of this submission to the topics is how the film presents women, because the sample with a more masculine than most manly man look, all in order to satisfy feminist groups and avoid criticism, at the end of these women seem more intractable that a group of female authentic women witches. In addition, a version of them totally unrealistic shown, in terms of their physical strength, creating the fiction of being equally corpulent than men, which is patently false, if we consider it as something representative of the majority. It is clear that those who follow this false god of feminism despise true, for it was God who decided that the men and women were different, but not that one is less than the other, but in order to specialize in different tasks to improve the species. Society must lose their fear of those false gods, for there is nothing unworthy to defend that races remain intact as nature made them, or to recognize that men and women were different events for different tasks, but with the same right to be happy. This is a hypocritical society that subordinates everything to mere desire to do business, but does not realize that by prioritizing business on the dignity is what is lost than what you get in return. Just a stupid society thinks assumed by many a lie becomes a truth, because lying always lie and the world can not escape the consequences until they assume and correct their mistakes. Sometimes the fear of power acts as a force of gravity that distorts our perception of reality, without realizing that unconsciously we tend to justify the arguments that powerful pose us and we become mere instruments of their plans, this requires an exercise of impartiality and consider all the circumstances, beginning to doubt what they believe, because progress is to recognize our own mistakes. In addition, it is necessary to recover the ethics and morals of the importance for the progress of society because man does not live only to work and get more money, but the purpose of work and money is to help us to be happy and live with dignity.

Another example that in the end things are judged by the color of the glass we look at each other and not with justice in the case of how the film presents Native Americans, for their legitimate struggle to protect their land from white invaders it is proposed as an infamous aggression against the colonizer, when the truth is just the opposite, it is the colonizer who stole their land and led them to near total extermination. At present there are many descendants of those settlers who regret what they did say their ancestors but how many of them have proposed that land be delivered to those natives with which to create their own independent nation? Clearly it says and do is not the same. We live in a time when people presumed to be aware and impartial, but do not realize that since childhood they are taught that we live in a democracy when this is false, because in fact the power is reserved to a few politicians and entrepreneurs. We are told that we live in a just society where the rich every day are richer and the poor poorer, but worst of all is that people are being led inadvertently to a materialistic world that no longer will gives value or race or culture itself, thus citizens become twice poor, one in economics and one in the spiritual, because in the end turn out to be a simple mass of mestizos workers without principles or moral, that They do not know what society they belong or what to believe and who have no other goal in life to produce for their masters. Workers are deceived by telling them that their duty is to support miscegenation and they naively do, without understanding that they are only promoting their own ruin. This shows that these leftist parties that favor it, just pursue their own profit and not the good of the workers, just simply follow the topics set. People need to discuss things with real fairness to break the mental chains that hold them back into the light and from that moment begin to be truly free.

People should stop following those false idols like alcohol, feminism, pro or miscegenation, and reject destructive cults that only seek mental slavery of man, as it is based in the Vatican. You need to understand that appearances and reality are not the same and that evil always goes where it is supposed to is good, in order to impersonate him and manipulate people. Therefore, it is a serious mistake to believe that the fact that there are good things in an ideology mean that everything in it is good, just as politics is so wrong to be very right as being very left because truth is neutral and only those who use mental manipulation would have you believe that things can only have a single point of view.

Despite all its flaws, I believe that the American cinema is still the best performing in the world, therefore it is a pity that today is so subject to topical and contemporary prejudices only in order to be more commercial.

REFUGEES OR INVASIVE

It is absolutely frivolous behavior of some political parties mainly leftist using immigration solely for partisan purposes, it qualify as refugees people who enter illegally in Europe and in many cases resorting to violence to get it, because they attack the border police fulfills its duty to try to avoid it, they claim that these immigrants come because they lack the essentials of life, but then how can they pay a fortune for mafias provide them boats in which to get there? In addition, when these illegal immigrants do not achieve their economic goals often engage in crime, and when they get a contract of employment is at the expense of devaluing the salaries of the country in which they are installed, harming thus the working class. European governments are demonstrating a clear lack of self-government by equating these immigrants with full citizens, because by doing such a thing are favoring crime, to convey the message that crime does not have punishment and thereby cause increased social tension, they allow those who have entered illegally and have never paid taxes remain with social aid instead are denied to those that did. A social system quality is only possible if there are clear limits. It is necessary that the countries of origin of these immigrants take responsibility and establish a policy of birth control by which births are in line with assets that can generate. But the worst part is that European governments are ignoring the suicide of his own people by allowing birth drops to alarming levels, a society that has no children is a sick society. The truth is that feminism has on the human mind, the same effect as a birth control pill causes in the body, sterilizing the population, the proof is that it is precisely the countries where implemented is feminism where more lower rates birth, to be greater than the number of deaths than births. We need to reflect and understand that although feminism includes good things, does not mean that all its tenets are. Europe’s population is letting invade doing anything about it, hoping that immigrants pay to satisfy their interests, but only a fool would think that an immigrant will defend or promote the culture of the people they are replacing, when even he asked permission to settle in their cities. A true refugee is one who enters the country authorized by the recipient and not by their own choice or through violence, because then he can not be considered a refugee but invader. People think you’re doing well by supporting illegal immigration and miscegenation, but this is the only thing that causes the lowering of wages, crime and social disunity, in addition to serving the interests of slave traders and exploiters. It is a pity that even the media to confusion lend when they call refugees who are invaders, or say that there was a rescue when what happened is human trafficking, because who pays money to buy a boat with which try to enter a country in secret is not a castaway who needed rescuing and therefore are not rescuers who collect them but traffickers. Sooner or later society will realize the serious mistake he made, but may be too late to avoid the conflicts that this can generate.

MEN O INSECTS

It is regrettable to see how many people live their lives without performing repetitive behaviors almost taking time to stop and watch the world around them. When this act are not different from those animals like insects whose lives are directed to do things in an automatic mode. It is true that the need to work or care for children very difficult the task of analyzing the world around us to understand, but it is also true that many people only associate the free time superfluous entertainment based on stimulus simple way, without any intellectual effort. They believe that culture is simply to learn what others have thought or written. These people do not understand that the essence of the universe is based on the ability to reflect and understand their profound truth, which is one of the most wonderful experiences that exist, because it is through this reflection when we become aware of our own existence and our ability to improve the world around us. For this reason, drugs and alcohol should be rejected by any being who appreciates his intelligence, because nullify the conscience becoming grosser automata, besides damaging our brain. The truth is that most people know only the superficial part of life, real life begins when we try to understand the mechanics of the universe and from there we enjoy changing that serves to improve our lives, because we are also part of evolution and therefore we can participate. Life people criticizing this despicable political class that represents us is passed, but nevertheless their blatant lies are created when we say we live in a democracy when that’s not true. They do not understand that the materialistic and mean people show an inordinate interest in occupying the paid positions because of their inability to know how to value the importance of small things. These people lack sensitivity and spend their mediocre lives trying to amass great fortunes, because they think that money will remedy the emptiness they feel inside, but that gap just disappear when you understand that the key to happiness lies in putting honesty and dignity to other things. Precisely for this reason such people should not occupy positions of responsibility. But all the blame is not only these despicable politicians, because they just do what they can expect from a petty being, which is rich at the expense of the people with lies, guilt is above all of that social mass that does not understand leisure rather than as a means to obtain vain amusements, never worry about thinking and seek the real truth that is around it. It’s not just walk kilometers with the car or plane, that is also good at times, but it is also important to take time to reflect on the world around us, because through meditation we can break the limitations of our material body and travel through time and space, in order to discover the wonders of the universe can provide us. Philosophy is the blood of the universe, so when we start to think we become the architects of the world around us. Arguably the philosopher is the traveler’s mind, so it is important to question the things around us, because through meditation can leave the topics of our time and discover the truth located beyond appearances. Because unfortunately in this world in which we live is not literary talent, but the ability to commune with the prevailing socio-political situation, i.e. the more conventional result a book and less question the politically assumed lies, most likely to rewards being awarded in the international media, because often the economics and politics rest on tastes and misconceptions, hence the tendency to reward those who condescends to the established system. Because when a lie is assumed by most that lie becomes law and the entire social system revolves around it and the whole power play is designed to justify the lie and who question it becomes enemy of those who obtained their justifying charges that false order of values. So who you have these charges react attacking those who try to warn of the danger humbly telling the truth, who act and think only of greed, even at the cost of destroying the society in which they live. This is how nations often condemned to ruin and empires collapse, because once the lie is implanted in the nuclei of power, nobody can question it and as a result are unable to stop its disintegration.

It is currently fashionable to say that everything comes down to a society of bad politicians who deceive good workers, but such a thing is not true, because actually the mediocrity of the world would not be such if it were not for vagrancy class worker who is believed too easily the lies they tell them, this happens because they do not want to bother to look for themselves the truth, complain about the greed of politicians when they are greedy, complaining about the lack of ethics when they do not know which means the moral word, these people forget that there is not only material wealth also there is spiritual and that the same can find a poor person who is also a scoundrel, like a rich quite dignity, it is true that a better world is possible, but only you can get when every citizen reject mediocrity is inside himself, because mediocrity of the political class is only the reflection of the mediocrity of the society it represents.

Actually, petty people are unhappy because they do not understand that the key to happiness is to live with balance and moderation, do not understand that in the same way that to produce life is necessary to unite earth and water in a balanced way, the same way for that human relationships are fruitful it is necessary to accompany the material desire of wealth with the desire for a life fully developed in the spiritual aspect. You need to understand that the common good is also the good of oneself, and only when you learn to respect the rights of others is being able to live in society. Because a brutish soul, forget the spiritual values becomes numb and unable to feel, because a man who only takes into account materialism is like a desert lacks water and therefore unable to develop full life, a person will never be happy to get more wealth, these tormented souls find peace only when you understand that to destroy the crust that covers his soul must abandon vanity and return to a humane and fair attitude.

Explained from metaphysical point of view you could say it’s like petty people had been displaced in their behavior toward the left side of the electromagnetic spectrum of colors, then on the left side red color representing matter and energy is but also coarseness, while on the opposite side is the blue color representing spiritual values and sensitivity, therefore, the proper attitude would be located in the medium where the green color represents the balance between matter and spirit. This intermediate position is the best of both colors receive the same influence and so is the generating of life. People despots bending only toward one of the colors in their emotional aspect, they lose the ability to get the most out of the universal energies and that they becomes rough in some respects, which makes them unhappy because they refuse to assess all dimensional aspects of the universe. Actually emotional character and the colors are related, this is because the universe is governed by two main polarities that could be defined as male and female, earth and water, heat and cold, red and blue, matter and spirit left and right, plus many other examples. This bipolarity of the universe is present in most aspects of our life and it is useful to know to find the perfect balance in each of the situations. Therefore, those who overvalue the material part of life and undervalue the spiritual, it is as if they were blind and therefore unable to understand the cosmos in perspective. This behavior is what is usually defined as a materialistic personality and only when the balance is restored life can reach their fullest.

A SOCIETY HYPOCRITE

People complain of the political class that has but what politicians can be expected to emerge from a degenerate society? This is a society that moves away from the moral belief that it moves away from religious organizations. Do they not know how to distinguish which are two entirely different things? The fact that religious organizations serve religion for evil and acquire power, does not mean that religion is bad, just that someone uses a weapon to hurt does not mean the gun is bad, evil will always be on the person and not the means used to express that bad. But this mediocre society attacks religion and moral belief that attacks religious organizations, being that way aimlessly, for every person and every nation need ethical values on which to base their lives and not just mere impulses greed that rule today.

You allow your women refuse to have children because they believe it is better to live as men and thus provoke the suicide of your society, and still have the cynicism of saying that there is no problem because the children may have Immigrants Good How can you be so petty as to destroy your race and your culture and stay so quiet, you do not understand that both are inculcated into your society for millennia values and all you despise? How can you be so naive to believe that some immigrants who in some cases are from companies coming to the Stone Age to be folded without your beliefs or your culture? How can you think that they will respect you if You are not even able to have control over your own borders. Believe chaos and a new tower of babel only by greed to exploit these immigrants as slaves, because they only think in commercial production and not people. Ignorant you are not understanding the true instigators of miscegenation are the powerful and companies seeking to convert the working class into a single mass of slaves. But the most pathetic of all, be precisely the left parties, which both boast support workers, those most in favor. They tell you it’s because you collaborate humanitarianism and naively, without realizing to be creating a society of identical slaves to ancient Athens, and to favor all those corrupt politicians linked to businesses. You allow the entry of illegal immigrants, then you miss to get robbed and ownership of social aid for which you have quoted, but now you refuse to give to them. But is it perhaps believe that your actions have consequences? No you are able to understand that the true humanitarianism is not to promote uncontrolled immigration and miscegenation, but to help people perform at their own land, because migration can only make sense when done legally and among similar companies, to avoid inter alia the lowering of wages and the consequent damage to the working class.

You allow your daughters to their boyfriends bring to your homes to sleep and then have the cynicism of saying no problem, because everything can solve the abortion. It is that the word you dignity and life of those creatures that you are going to undo do not have meaning?

You claim to be against the drug but give to your children the ways of consuming alcohol before them stupid phrase saying that this is a good drug.

If you had dignity you would reject the consumption of drugs, but not through repression as do the cowards and hypocrites, but by giving the good example of refuse you to consume any type of drug is legal or illegal.

You will complain of high rates of crime, but at the same time you stay indifferent when serial murderers sentenced to thousands of years in prison after leaving prison sentence ridiculous, just because they say have repented. Do you think there is some criminal who does not claim this just to get out of jail? Do not you understand that those politicians who call Democrats created those laws that promote impunity only to apply it to themselves? Granted prison leave to the murderers as if the lives of people they would like, do not understand that when a person is in jail is not to do a job, but because it is a danger to society, is folly to allow temporary release a criminal, except in compliance immediately prior to his conviction, when it may make sense a gradual adaptation to the outside world period. You have to understand that these politicians do not care about democracy or citizens, because they do nothing to lie with the sole purpose of getting rich.

It is necessary for society to understand that morality is necessary to create a decent society, and there can be no progress in the disorder causing miscegenation, nor may arise a model society of an economy based only on mere commercial production and slavery of the working class.

Call prejudice to things that are not, just because you are unable to spend a minimum of your lives to reflect on the world around you. Do not you understand that knowing the truth can not rely solely on the media, government or schools? They have their own interests that do not coincide with yours. We must demand and value free time as an effective means to analyze things around us objectively, without conforming with the version of reality that others want us to propose. Culture is not just to remember, but also to reason. If we do not give kids free time to develop their own personality and uncover the lies that teach them how they can discover?

Calm your conscience by donating money to (NGOs) without realizing that many of these organizations are not interested in eradicating poverty, thus essentially are companies for which the poor are only a means of enrichment. You say help the poor, but you have ever worried require managers of these companies they tell you how much money earmarked for their own salaries? That is not humanity is hypocrisy.

Call democracy to a social system in which only the poor pay taxes, for the rich and politicians serve as tax amnesties and other methods to avoid paying their fair share. Politicians refuse to act against companies that defraud the many links they have with them, it would be like fined themselves.

You let yourselves be carried away by appeals to anger against the opposing parties without realizing that it is just a method to deceive you, for none of them advocates the creation of a genuine democracy in which voting laws and not just games. You will complain of it all, but many of you would do the same if you were in his place. If you have no dignity, as you can demand the same dignity to degenerate political class that represents you. Poor world.