Back to Story

Average Ratings

  • Overall Rating
  • Plot
  • Writing Style
  • Grammar & Punctuation

What is your opinion?

CHAPTER 1 REVIEW

"CHAPTER 1 Plot Clarity & Pacing Clarity: The history of the location is very well-defined. You’ve established a clear timeline: the British era (the origin of the evil), the "official" cover-up (the madwoman story), and the modern-day superstition (the students and security guards). As a reader, I have a clear understanding of why this place is haunted. Pacing: The pacing is steady and rhythmic. It moves from a physical description to a historical flashback, and then back to the present day. It feels like a slow-burn introduction that builds a sense of inevitable doom. Character Development & Relatability Development: While we don't have a protagonist yet, the "Doctor" is developed as a classic, terrifying antagonist. His dual role as a physicist and surgeon makes his cruelty feel calculated and "scientific," which is more unsettling than random violence. Relatability: The fear of the "forbidden place" on a campus or in a town is a very relatable experience. Most readers have that one building or area they were told to avoid as children or students, so the setting immediately taps into that shared anxiety. Emotional Engagement Engagement: There is a strong sense of injustice and lingering pain in this chapter. The mention of subjects being kept in cages half their size and having limbs swapped creates a visceral, stomach-churning reaction. The emotional hook isn't "sadness" so much as a "righteous fear", the reader wants to see the truth come out, but is also terrified of what that truth looks like. Structural Integrity Consistency: The tone is consistently dark and "legendary." The transition between the Doctor’s experiments and the modern-day haunting feels logical within the rules of a ghost story. Plot Holes: The only minor point of confusion is the "official story." If the authorities found a "house of horrors" with bodies buried in walls and cages, a single "madwoman" story seems like a very difficult lie to maintain, even two centuries ago. It makes me wonder if the authorities were also involved in the cover-up. Strengths & Weak Areas Strengths: Your imagery is exceptional. "Windows... like blind eyes," "fortress of cold stone," and "chains dragging across the stone floor" are classic horror tropes used very effectively here. The personification of the building ("the building itself seemed to shiver") makes the mortuary feel like the primary antagonist. Weak Areas: The chapter relies heavily on telling rather than showing. Since this is an introductory legend, it works, but as a reader, I am now craving a specific character to follow. The "students" and "teachers" are mentioned as a collective group; the narrative will need a "foolish" or "brave" individual to step into the light (or darkness) soon to keep the momentum going. Also, the phrase "And every night..." is used a few times in the latter half, which makes the ending feel a bit repetitive. This story has a lot of promise, and I’d be happy to share more in-depth feedback if you’re interested. You can reach me easily through the email icon on my profile."

  • Overall Rating
  • Plot
  • Writing Style
  • Grammar & Punctuation
Title

"I really loved the book it was amazing, it felt so real that made me feel excited, hope to read other books like this!"

  • Overall Rating
  • Plot
  • Writing Style
  • Grammar & Punctuation