Original Intelligence - A Defense Of Human Art
Share with your friends
Customize readability

Original Intelligence - A Defense Of Human Art

All Rights Reserved ©

Summary

Original Intelligence, as defined by I, Natasha V. Walker, and my colleagues who have requested to remain anonymous, is the ability to creativity and emotional expression unique to living consciousness. It is, by our discovered definition, art.

Status
3mo ago
Chapters
3
Rating
5.0 (1 review)
Age Rating
18+

Chapter I - What Is Art - Pt. 1 - Conscious Skill

Art: This is a word many people struggle to define. For a long time, my colleagues fell into this pit of struggle as well. We were stuck with the difficulty of not knowing what truly defined art. It is funny because we all consider ourselves accomplished artists. Professional painters, authors, and published musicians. Yet we all scratched our heads at the very simple question, “What is art, really?”

In its simplest definition, Art is, according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, “the conscious use of skill and creative imagination especially in the production of aesthetic objects.”

There are several important factors within this sentence, but hereafter, until this chapter concludes, we will focus on the keywords, “conscious,” and, “skill.” Skill is defined as, also as per the prior dictionary, “the ability to use one’s knowledge effectively and readily in execution or performance.”

If art is most defined as the conscious use of skill, then what skill is being used in generating content via Artificial Intelligence? Would it not make more sense to label the AI as the creator of the image and the prompter as the client?

Take this example: Jeremiah is a well-established artist. Belle is an appreciator of Jeremiah’s work. She mails him a letter requesting a picture of a couple holding hands under a cherry tree. Who is the artist?

That seems like a redundant question, but let’s dive deeper. Replace Jeremiah with an image generation software. Belle asks this image generation software to generate a photo of said couple holding hands under said tree. Somehow, in the eyes of the public, it is Belle that is now considered the “artist.” There is a very fundamental flaw in this logic. No matter how in depth the request, commission, or prompt is, it is still the Jeremiah, or the AI, that is creating the image. Is the one commissioning the AI now considered the artist?

One might fight and say something along the lines of, “She is the artist because the AI is a machine and not a person.” If you claim this statement, there is some truth. The machine is, indeed, not a person. However, the machine still generated the image based on the prompt or commission given by Belle. Belle did not create this image; she merely asked someone or something to create it for her.

Using this logic, the AI is the artist. That is, while more accurate, still an unsatisfying answer. There is one small reason for this. Artificial Intelligence is not conscious. There can be no conscious use of skill and creative imagination if there is no conscious imagination.

Hence, Artificial Intelligence cannot be the artist.

This leaves many people to think that Belle is the artist by default. However, not many people I have interviewed seem to think of a third possibility: there is no artist. When AI is involved in the creation of aesthetic objects, there is no conscious imagination, there is no skill, and there is no artist.

Only a customer.

Let Natasha V. Walker know what you thought about this chapter!

Arthur
Arthur

Frfr. Fuck AI bs.

3 months

Further Recommendations

The Half Blood Wolf (Lupus Antiqua Series #1)

Suiihera: OMG, I just finished reading your story, and I really enjoyed it! The world you've created is fascinating. As I was reading, I could easily picture the characters, emotions, and key moments unfolding visually.Have you ever considered adapting it into a visual storytelling format such as a comic, man...

Read Now
The Lone White Wolf

Sarah: Hello! I really enjoyed reading your story. It made me curious—after finishing this one, did it give you ideas for completely new projects, or do you usually like to take a break before starting another story?

Read Now
In all grey

Louise: It was a good story, i liked both MCs, I was a bit disappointed by the completely random ending that felt like we missed a few chapters. Definitely worth a read though.

Read Now
My 21 Brothers

Allison O'Neill: I’m really hoping this gets updated soon! I hope whatever the author has going on gets better and she is able to reclaim her life

Read Now
Full Volume

Leppo Ciappo: Good story. I appreciate the development of the characters.

Read Now
The Rewrite

Kate Schimmer Child: Amazing plot and characters. And so impressive you’ve written a story inside a story. Can’t wait to read more of your work ❤️

Read Now
The Alpha’s Mate

Sheri: Love the plot, interesting characters and growth shown. Many different subplots add interest. Grammar and syntax indicate possible non English writer.

Read Now
Finding Them

Peggy: It's well written. The plot is so different then other writers. I'm looking forward to more of the author.

Read Now
Playing Defense

Pam: This was the best book I have read in a long time

Read Now