Damn

"So let's go through this one step at a time. Your summary is legit bigger than all of your chapters. Like,.. It hurts to read. It took me fifteen minutes and like that, I wasted fifteen minutes. The story was none, existent guy. I hate to be like this but we'll begin with your plot. I'm going to be rough and say that I'm docking three stars off the bat. One for your summary is longer than all of your chapters. another star because I didn't get what you were trying to relay in the story. All I got was that it was about terrorism. And that's all. You're not painting a picture, you're not informing, you're not telling a story. So I think that your plot suffers from the lack of detail and just having no thickness to it. And the third star because I'm just upset at reading such a thing. Like I know that's not a valid reason so I'll give you your third reason why I think the plot is worth of being a two-star. It is a book that maybe took the writer a total of maybe an hour to write. It was simple, not over-detailed, and could have really just not existed. I know it's harsh but I don't think the author was serious when they wrote the story. And so I'm giving the plot a total of two stars. Okay, writing style time. This is where the author catches a break. So writing styles can vary and each author has a unique writing style. As I said above the author was not very detailed or informative. So what makes this writing style worth at least four stars? I give the author the benefit that they can at least write clearly. No mistakes were seen and no misspells. Plus the words used were big and juicy. That part of the story was the best part. Looking up the definition for the big words that were used. So the author gets 4 stars on writing style. And while we are at it the technical portion is five stars. At the end of the day, the author succeeded in writing a clean manuscript with little to no errors. But at the great cost of the plot and the story itself. And as a writer, author, and journalist I think that even though the total of the story would be 11/15 which would give it a three-star I have to go with my beliefs. Which is the belief that the plot itself is the most important thing in writing. And sure you can have a neatly written and correction-free book but if the plot is nonexistent or bland then who is going to read it? So I say this as kind as I can. The story International Criminal in my eyes is worth 2 stars. I'm not going lower one because I don't want to come off as attacking this writer. And two because the story is edited to perfection. It truly does look great. And at the end of the day, it's my opinion. And I can't prove to inkitt why I scored the plot so low. I can really only say that there wasn't one to really follow and it didn't connect with me. So if you are a reader and you feel the need to prove me wrong then, please. Pick up this story and delve straight into it."